Noometry

Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #68 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.8 to 42.7.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.946.0
Released2024-06-142026-08-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked1731

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Coding12091482
LMArena WebDev—1593
SciCode—46.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
APEX-Agents—47.5%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts12021460
ARC-AGI-2—42.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—54.5%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—5.4%
DTBench—88%
LMCA—41.4%
Surface Evolver Bench—45%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.38

Math Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Math12161456
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Expert11711482

Multimodal Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision—1271

Multilingual Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Non-English12061430
LMArena Chinese12141504
LMArena French11971465
LMArena German11921438
LMArena Japanese11281384
LMArena Korean11481393
LMArena Russian12191415
LMArena Spanish11951448

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Instruction Following12031439

Long Context Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Longer Query12251450

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text12251441
LMArena Creative Writing12031384
LMArena Multi-Turn12141441
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1671

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.8 27B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper