Model comparison

GLM-5 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5 scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5 leads 66.0 to 42.7.

Side by side

GLM-5 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
GLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index46.135.9
Released2026-02-112024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked4517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 49.0 (#52), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14611209
SWE-bench Verified72.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1434—
SWE-bench Multilingual69.7%—
WeirdML48.2%—
ALE-Bench765.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5: 31.1 (#71), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Terminal-Bench52.4%—
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking9.8%—
τ²-bench Retail73.7%—
τ²-bench Telecom86.8%—
Vending-Bench 24,432—

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 27.6 (#116), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14521202
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
ARC-AGI-144.7%—
Chess Puzzles10%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.83—
ForecastBench61—

Math GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 46.4 (#71), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14401216
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions65.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)16.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 52.3 (#64), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert14541171
GPQA Diamond87.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.1%—

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 53.7 (#58), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14301206
LMArena Chinese15111214
LMArena French14551197
LMArena German14451192
LMArena Japanese14161128
LMArena Korean14231148
LMArena Russian14361219
LMArena Spanish14541195

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 75.2 (#67), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14281203

Long Context GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 44.7 (#60), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14461225
CL-bench18.7%—

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 66.0 (#38), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14461225
LMArena Creative Writing14391203
LMArena Multi-Turn14561214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1601—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper