Noometry

Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 32.0.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.951.5
Released2024-06-142026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding12091498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12021483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math12161490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert11711488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English12061474
LMArena Chinese12141530
LMArena Russian12191484
LMArena French1197—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12031460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query12251482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text12251476
LMArena Creative Writing12031449
LMArena Multi-Turn12141481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper