Noometry

Model comparison

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

49.6

Rank #45 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 58.4 to 31.4.

Side by side

GLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index49.635.3
Released2026-08-202024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked3617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.7 (#26), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding15061209
DeepSWE63.4%—
FrontierCode31.8%—
LMArena WebDev1614—
SciCode51.6%—
ALE-Bench303.55—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.3 (#41), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
APEX-Agents52.8%—
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 31.7 (#69), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14901202
CritPt15.4%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.15—
Epoch Capabilities Index151.9—

Math GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#38), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14991216
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)55.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.9%—
ProofBench21%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#33), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert15121171
GPQA Diamond90.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.6 (#25), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.2 (#24), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14621206
LMArena Chinese15291214
LMArena French14951196
LMArena German14571192
LMArena Japanese14201128
LMArena Korean14431148
LMArena Russian14721219
LMArena Spanish14711195

Instruction Following GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8 (#17), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14801203

Long Context GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.3 (#41), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14791225

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3-Flash leads

GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.4 (#49), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

BenchmarkGLM-5.3-FlashNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14711225
LMArena Creative Writing14401203
LMArena Multi-Turn14711214

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.6 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.3-Flash or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.7 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.3-Flash and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.3-Flash has 36 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper