Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 31.4.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.339.5
Released2024-06-142026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked177

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Coding1209—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1202—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.62

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1216—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
LMArena Expert1171—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1206—
LMArena Chinese1214—
LMArena French1196—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Russian1219—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1203—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1225—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1225—
LMArena Creative Writing1203—
LMArena Multi-Turn1214—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper