Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-72B

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 32.0 to 11.5.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.930.8
Released2024-06-142024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Coding12091165
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.3%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts12021148

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math12161164

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Expert11711136
GPQA Diamond—28.8%

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English12061135
LMArena Chinese12141186
LMArena French11971159
LMArena German11921084
LMArena Japanese11281061
LMArena Korean11481050
LMArena Russian12191104
LMArena Spanish11951110

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following12031141

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query12251157

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text12251166
LMArena Creative Writing12031137
LMArena Multi-Turn12141160

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper