Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.9 to 29.8.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index30.235.3
Released—2024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding10901209
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731202

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math11171216

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert10641171

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10331206
LMArena Chinese10701214
LMArena Russian10451219
LMArena French—1196
LMArena German—1192
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10561203

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10711225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text10801225
LMArena Creative Writing10461203
LMArena Multi-Turn10531214

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper