Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 32.0 to 9.1.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Nemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index35.929.7
Released2024-06-142024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1209—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Reasoning Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Hard Prompts1202—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—121.23
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Math1216—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond—27.6%
LMArena Expert1171—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1206—
LMArena Chinese1214—
LMArena French1197—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Russian1219—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1203—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1225—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1225—
LMArena Creative Writing1203—
LMArena Multi-Turn1214—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper