Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 31.3 to 9.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1204 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1179 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.