Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 42.7.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index35.939.4
Released2024-06-14—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12091347

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12021322

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12161305

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert11711308

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12061275
LMArena Chinese12141304
LMArena French11971328
LMArena German11921282
LMArena Korean11481206
LMArena Russian12191268
LMArena Spanish11951336
LMArena Japanese1128—

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12031299

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12251312

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12251311
LMArena Creative Writing12031264
LMArena Multi-Turn12141309

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper