Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 32.0 to 19.5.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index35.932.7
Released2024-06-14—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12091210

Reasoning Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12021208

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12161208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1171—

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12061160
LMArena Chinese12141192
LMArena Russian12191187
LMArena French1197—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12031186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12251194

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12251218
LMArena Creative Writing12031199
LMArena Multi-Turn12141221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.2 vs 35.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper