Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Ultra NVIDIA

42.5

Rank #113 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Ultra scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Ultra leads 52.5 to 36.1.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Ultra and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Nemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index42.539.4
Released2026-06-04—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$2.40—
Results tracked3016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 38.1 (#182), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14681347
FrontierCode13.6%—
SciCode40.3%—
WeirdML43.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 23.4 (#126), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
APEX-Agents22.7%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 31.0 (#82), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14521322
CritPt3.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
Mystery Game Puzzles20%—
DTBench90.1%—
LMCA36.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.17—

Math Too close to call

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 35.3 (#187), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14571305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—
ProofBench2%—

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#61), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert14721308
GPQA Diamond85.4%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.5 (#64), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14271275
LMArena Chinese14971304
LMArena French14721328
LMArena German14711282
LMArena Korean13861206
LMArena Russian14171268
LMArena Spanish14541336

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.7 (#88), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14181299

Long Context Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#81), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14371312

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Ultra leads

Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#36), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14451311
LMArena Creative Writing13981264
LMArena Multi-Turn14111309
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1692—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Ultra better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 3 Ultra or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Ultra and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Ultra has 30 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper