Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 50.4.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1346 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1322 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1305 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1307 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1298 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.