Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 22× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 48.4 to 17.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 15.4% for Nemotron 3 Super and 85.1% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 51.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 36% | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | 1,189 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274), Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | 85.1% |
| CritPt | 3.1% | 13.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.74 |
Math Qwen3.7 Max leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1381 | 1488 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1488 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139), Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1356 | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1430 | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1482 |
| LMArena French | 1404 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1460 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1484 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1450 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 22× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.7 Max?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.7 Max share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.