Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Super

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 335× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

52.2

Rank #34 Reported

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

39.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.8 to 17.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 79.3% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 15.4% for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
  • GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
  • Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
GPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index52.239.6
Released2025-12-112026-03-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K262K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$21$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$168$0.45
Results tracked821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
LMArena Coding—1403
ALE-Bench—213.9

Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
NYT Connections (extended)79.3%15.4%
ARC-AGI-254.2%—
SimpleBench57.4%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
CritPt—3.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1386
Epoch Capabilities Index155.41—

Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74%—
FrontierMath Tier 446%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%
LMArena Math—1381
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)31.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert—1397

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English—1356
LMArena Chinese—1430
LMArena French—1404
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1336
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following—1347

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query—1362

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text—1378
LMArena Creative Writing—1317
LMArena Multi-Turn—1369

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Nemotron 3 Super?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Super costs 335× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3 Super share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper