Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

39.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

38.4

Rank #176 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 28.4 to 17.9.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
  • Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 Flash specifications
Nemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 Flash
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.638.4
Released2026-03-112026-04-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.08$0.19
Output $ / M tokens$0.45$1.13
Results tracked2113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 Flash
ALE-Bench213.9326.4
SciCode36%—
WeirdML38%—
LMArena Coding1403—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 Flash
SimpleBench—35.2%
NYT Connections (extended)15.4%—
CritPt3.1%—
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts1386—
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—77.1%
LMCA—31%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.26

Math Too close to call

Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95), Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
SimpleQA Verified—15.9%
LMArena Expert1397—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English1356—
LMArena Chinese1430—
LMArena French1404—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Russian1336—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1347—

Long Context Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1362—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Text1378—
LMArena Creative Writing1317—
LMArena Multi-Turn1369—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper