Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.1.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
MiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
ProviderMiniMaxNVIDIA
Noometry Index38.940.1
Released2025-12-232026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K262K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$0.45
Results tracked2221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Coding14211403
ALE-Bench623.83213.9
LMArena WebDev1384—
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98), Nemotron 3 Super: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
Terminal-Bench36.6%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Super leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
NYT Connections (extended)11.2%15.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14111386
CritPt—3.1%

Math Nemotron 3 Super leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Math13971380
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%

Knowledge Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert14311398
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English13781355
LMArena Chinese14301432
LMArena French14041405
LMArena German13811341
LMArena Russian13871336
LMArena Spanish13971417
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1298—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following14001347

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query14161362

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text13921378
LMArena Creative Writing13611317
LMArena Multi-Turn13961369

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.1 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.1 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiniMax-M2.1 or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 39.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and Nemotron 3 Super share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper