Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3 32B
Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3 32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 32B in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 56.1 to 53.1.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 32B.
- Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153), Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 36% | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Qwen3 32B leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274), Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.1% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Too close to call
Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95), Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1381 | 1399 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
Knowledge Qwen3 32B leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139), Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1356 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1430 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149), Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1305 |
Long Context Qwen3 32B leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134), Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135), Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3 32B?
Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3 32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 32B?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3 32B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.