Noometry

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3 14B

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

39.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.0

Rank #222 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3 14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 41.5 to 38.0.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.635.0
Released2026-03-112025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K131K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.08$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$0.45$1.40
Results tracked2112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153), Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
SciCode36%31.6%
WeirdML38%—
LMArena Coding1403—
ALE-Bench213.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%

Reasoning Too close to call

Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274), Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
CritPt3.1%0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
NYT Connections (extended)15.4%—
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1386—
DTBench—64%
LMCA—18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.23

Math Too close to call

Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95), Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions60.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.4%
LMArena Math1381—

Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136), Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond—63.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.4%
LMArena Expert1397—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1356—
LMArena Chinese1430—
LMArena French1404—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Russian1336—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1347—

Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads

Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134), Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.5%
LMArena Longer Query1362—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkNemotron 3 SuperQwen3 14B
LMArena Text1378—
LMArena Creative Writing1317—
LMArena Multi-Turn1369—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3 14B?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 35.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 14B?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 36.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen3 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper