Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Nemotron 3 Super
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Nemotron 3 Super in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 38.9 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 25.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 38% for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 38% |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1403 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| SciCode | — | 36% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 213.9 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1386 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 15.4% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1381 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1397 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1356 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1347 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1362 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Nemotron 3 Super share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.