Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen1.5-32B
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 38.2 to 13.5.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1155 |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274), Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1131 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95), Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1381 | 1155 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1356 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1430 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1404 | 1100 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1058 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1089 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1007 |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149), Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1116 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Qwen1.5-32B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.