Model comparison

Codestral vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Codestral Mistral AI

30.6

Rank #290 Reported

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 1 category and Nemotron 3 Super in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 39.4 to 27.3.
  • Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
  • Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codestral and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
CodestralNemotron 3 Super
ProviderMistral AINVIDIA
Noometry Index30.640.1
Released2024-05-292026-03-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output8K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$0.45
Results tracked721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads

Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralNemotron 3 Super
ALE-Bench137.78213.9
Aider Polyglot11.1%—
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
BigCodeBench Instruct41.8%—
LMArena Coding—1403
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—
HumanEval+73.8%—
MBPP+61.9%—

Reasoning Codestral leads

Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralNemotron 3 Super
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%
CritPt—3.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1386

Math Not comparable

Codestral: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralNemotron 3 Super
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%
LMArena Math—1380

Knowledge Not comparable

Codestral: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert—1398

Multilingual Not comparable

Codestral: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English—1355
LMArena Chinese—1432
LMArena French—1405
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1336
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codestral: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following—1347

Long Context Not comparable

Codestral: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query—1362

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codestral: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text—1378
LMArena Creative Writing—1317
LMArena Multi-Turn—1369

Frequently asked questions

Is Codestral better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

Is Codestral or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Codestral and Nemotron 3 Super share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper