Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 25.9 to 18.7.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1319 |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1380 | 1316 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1273 |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1405 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1254 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1275 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (39.4 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.