Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 48.6 to 38.3.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1292 |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| WeirdML | 38% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1272 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1381 | 1305 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1294 |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1356 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1430 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1404 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1288 |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1246 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.