Model comparison
MiniMax M1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where MiniMax M1 leads 46.0 to 38.3.
Side by side
| MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-06-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1292 |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1272 |
Math MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1360 | 1305 |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | 1294 |
Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1320 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1369 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1330 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1220 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1263 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1246 |
Long Context MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1272 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax M1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax M1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.