Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Wizardlm 13b

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

40.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 52.3 to 30.5.

Side by side

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.631.4
Released2025-12-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.20—
Results tracked1810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding13781035

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts13481018

Math Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math13711017

Knowledge Not comparable

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.6%—
LMArena Expert1355—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English13201034
LMArena Chinese13821023
LMArena French1396—
LMArena German1348—
LMArena Japanese1268—
LMArena Korean1269—
LMArena Russian1303—
LMArena Spanish1376—

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13041048

Long Context Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query13001054

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text13481077
LMArena Creative Writing12691091
LMArena Multi-Turn13191047

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper