Noometry

Model comparison

Command R vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

40.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 52.3 to 38.2.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index31.440.6
Released2024-08-302025-12-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$0.20
Results tracked2918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Coding11691378
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LiveBench Coding17.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts11641348
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%—
DTBench46.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%—
LMCA9.2%—
LiveBench27.5%—

Math Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Math11551371
LiveBench Math19.4%—

Knowledge Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R: 31.0 (#221), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Expert11381355
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.6%
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R: 35.7 (#245), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Non-English11741320
LMArena Chinese11821382
LMArena French11621396
LMArena German11761348
LMArena Japanese11431268
LMArena Korean11631269
LMArena Russian11741303
LMArena Spanish11511376

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Instruction Following11671304
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%—

Long Context Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R: 36.3 (#231), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Longer Query11981300

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174)

BenchmarkCommand RNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text11871348
LMArena Creative Writing11701269
LMArena Multi-Turn11631319
LiveBench Language16.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Is Command R or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper