Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for Muse Spark and 7.4% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | 128.52 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | 7.4% |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | 46.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | — |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.