Model comparison

Magistral Small vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #289 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.3

Rank #41 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 30.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30% for Magistral Small and 88.9% for Muse Spark.
  • Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Magistral Small and Muse Spark specifications
Magistral SmallMuse Spark
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Noometry Index29.950.3
Released2025-06-102026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output40K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked1027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172), Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
SciCode35.2%51.5%
LMArena Coding—1482

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345), Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
CritPt0.3%11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19152.09
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
ARC-AGI-15%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1475
DTBench61.3%—

Math Muse Spark leads

Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253), Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
GPQA Diamond56.1%89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1458

Multimodal Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English—1464
LMArena Chinese—1507
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1457
LMArena Russian—1467
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following—1443

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Text—1474
LMArena Creative Writing—1460
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Small or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.6 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Muse Spark share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper