Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark leads 66.0 to 23.8.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 999 |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 976 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1026 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 980 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 978 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 988 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.