Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.3% for Llama 3-70B and 88.9% for Muse Spark.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Muse Spark specifications
Llama 3-70BMuse Spark
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index28.850.6
Released2024-04-182026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3127

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
LMArena Coding12061481
SciCode—51.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Muse Spark: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts11951474
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93152.04
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
CritPt—11.3%
DTBench54.2%—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%88.9%
LMArena Math12181455
ProofBench—17%
MATH Level 522.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
GPQA Diamond40.6%89.8%
LMArena Expert11491457
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
MMLU79.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English11421464
LMArena Chinese11141509
LMArena French12321497
LMArena German11691497
LMArena Korean10171459
LMArena Russian11591466
LMArena Spanish12411472
LMArena Japanese1017—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following11941442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query11741451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BMuse Spark
LMArena Text12211474
LMArena Creative Writing12101459
LMArena Multi-Turn12231477

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Muse Spark share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper