Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark leads 35.9 to 20.7.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
Math Not comparable
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1455 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | — |
Multimodal Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | — |
| LMArena French | 1497 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.