Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Yi-1.5-34B

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 54.1 to 14.8.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index50.330.6
Released2026-08-052024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding14951169
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14861160
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14711182
ProofBench43%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Expert14801144
GPQA Diamond—32%
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14781121
LMArena Chinese15111213
LMArena French15131156
LMArena Russian14871091
LMArena Spanish14981121
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14611139

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14751143

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14821173
LMArena Creative Writing14491135
LMArena Multi-Turn14941153
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper