Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Yi-1.5-34B

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Muse SparkYi-1.5-34B
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index50.630.6
Released2026-04-082024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding14811169
SciCode51.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14741160
CritPt11.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04—

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14551182
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond89.8%32%
LMArena Expert14571144
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14641121
LMArena Chinese15091213
LMArena French14971156
LMArena German14971111
LMArena Korean14591005
LMArena Russian14661091
LMArena Spanish14721121
LMArena Japanese—1021

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14421139

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14511143

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14741173
LMArena Creative Writing14591135
LMArena Multi-Turn14771153

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Yi-1.5-34B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper