Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.2 vs Wizardlm 13b
Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.3 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-08-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 31 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1495 | 1035 |
| DeepSWE | 54.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1533 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 12% | — |
| SciCode | 56.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 36.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 16% | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1018 |
| SimpleBench | 74.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.2% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 48.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.87 | — |
Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1471 | 1017 |
| ProofBench | 43% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1480 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1305 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1478 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1513 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1498 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1461 | 1048 |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads
Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.2 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1494 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1840 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.