Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

44.7

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 29.6.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.844.7
Released2026-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked2817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14971488
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1532—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14901483
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.18—

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
ProofBench43%—
LMArena Math—1473

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert14851489
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14791465
LMArena Chinese15191534
LMArena Russian14941472
LMArena French—1483
LMArena German—1487
LMArena Japanese—1497
LMArena Korean—1438
LMArena Spanish—1470

Instruction Following Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14661467

Long Context Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14831477

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text14861471
LMArena Creative Writing14441464
LMArena Multi-Turn15041478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 43.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper