Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen2.5-Max
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 25.6.
Side by side
| Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.9 | 40.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 37 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | 1359 |
| DeepSWE | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1542 | — |
| SciCode | 58.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), Qwen2.5-Max: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 31.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 7.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 15% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 6,520 | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1360 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.21 | 132.53 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 84.9% | — |
| CritPt | 15.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| DTBench | 94.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| LMCA | 49.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1483 | 1369 |
| ProofBench | 39% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | 1337 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.8% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), Qwen2.5-Max: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1465 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1472 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1518 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1494 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1466 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1451 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1483 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | 1377 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1457 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1479 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1437 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1485 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1927 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1260 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen2.5-Max?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5-Max share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.