Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen2.5-Max
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 36.9.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 40.7 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1359 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1360 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.53 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1369 |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Qwen2.5-Max: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1335 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1364 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Qwen2.5-Max?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Qwen2.5-Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.