Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Yi-34B
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.5 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1112 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1104 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1050 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1091 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Yi-34B?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Yi-34B better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Yi-34B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.