Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Yi-1.5-34B
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.5 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1169 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1160 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1213 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1091 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1139 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Yi-1.5-34B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.