Model comparison
Codestral vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Glimmer leads 40.4 to 27.3.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codestral | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1396 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Muse Glimmer share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.