Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Trinity Large Thinking
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Arcee AISummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 7 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 16.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 44.9% for Muse Glimmer and 36.1% for Trinity Large Thinking.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | 1238 |
| SciCode | 44.9% | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1381 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 2.6% | 0.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1366 |
Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1334 |
Long Context Too close to call
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Trinity Large Thinking share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.