Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 38.5.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 51.5 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.80 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1471 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1457 |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.24 |
Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1465 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1487 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1445 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1438 |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1457 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.