Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 40.8 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 74.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderBaiduAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.251.1
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked2029

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14551472
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%74.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14461457
SimpleBench—63%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.27

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math14371465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Expert14271476
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1248—

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14361436
LMArena Chinese15121487
LMArena French14661449
LMArena Russian14461444
LMArena Spanish14731452
LMArena German1462—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1406—

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14131437

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14221457

Writing & Preference Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text14451447
LMArena Creative Writing14261435
LMArena Multi-Turn14331456

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper