Model comparison

Muse Glimmer vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 31.1.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Muse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.729.3
Released2026-08-102024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1532

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding14161101
LMArena WebDev1355—
SciCode44.9%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13961100
CritPt2.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math14171151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert13861067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13841058
LMArena Chinese14121061
LMArena Russian13901111
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13751087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13821088

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text13891110
LMArena Creative Writing13391083
LMArena Multi-Turn13991068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Glimmer or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper