Model comparison

Muse Glimmer vs o1

Muse Glimmer and o1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 3 categories and o1 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 42.1.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer and o1 specifications
Muse Glimmero1
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index41.740.9
Released2026-08-102024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked1552

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), o1: 46.1 (#70)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Coding14161367
Aider Polyglot—61.7%
LMArena WebDev1355—
SciCode44.9%—
WeirdML—47.6%
LiveBench Coding—69.7%
CadEval—56%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—80.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—51.1%

Reasoning o1 leads

Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), o1: 27.9 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Hard Prompts13961371
SimpleBench—41.7%
ARC-AGI-1—30.7%
CritPt2.6%—
Chess Puzzles—15%
EnigmaEval—5.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—91.6%
DTBench—74.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
LMCA—22.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.91
LiveBench—75.7%

Math Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), o1: 36.1 (#175)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Math14171388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—14.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math—80.3%
MATH Level 5—94.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—9.3%

Knowledge o1 leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), o1: 41.5 (#110)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Expert13861361
GPQA Diamond—76.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8%
SimpleQA Verified—41.1%
Confabulations—11.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Vision—1168
GeoBench—80%
VPCT—37%
SpatialViz-Bench—41.4%

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), o1: 48.6 (#142)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Non-English13841358
LMArena Chinese14121394
LMArena Russian13901356
LMArena French—1344
LMArena German—1337
LMArena Japanese—1346
LMArena Korean—1396
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following o1 leads

Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), o1: 74.8 (#86)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Instruction Following13751367
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.5%

Long Context o1 leads

Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), o1: 50.3 (#9)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Longer Query13821378
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), o1: 55.6 (#144)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Glimmero1
LMArena Text13891366
LMArena Creative Writing13391348
LMArena Multi-Turn13991369
Short-Story Creative Writing—70.2%
LiveBench Language—65.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer better than o1?

Muse Glimmer and o1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.7 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Muse Glimmer or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and o1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper