Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs o1
Granite 4.2 30b and o1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 40.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 41.4.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 40.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127), o1: 45.7 (#64)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1394 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, o1: 24.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114), o1: 27.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1372 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.92 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, o1: 34.9 (#150)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge o1 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134), o1: 41.5 (#101)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1405 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, o1: 33.6 (#87)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146), o1: 48.8 (#137)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1415 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1342 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1343 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150), o1: 75.0 (#82)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1346 | 1368 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147), o1: 55.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1363 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1294 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1340 | 1368 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than o1?
Granite 4.2 30b and o1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 40.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and o1 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.