Model comparison

Muse Glimmer vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 42.7.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Muse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index41.735.9
Released2026-08-102024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1517

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14161209
LMArena WebDev1355—
SciCode44.9%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13961202
CritPt2.6%—

Math Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14171216

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert13861171

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13841206
LMArena Chinese14121214
LMArena Russian13901219
LMArena French—1197
LMArena German—1192
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13751203

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13821225

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text13891225
LMArena Creative Writing13391203
LMArena Multi-Turn13991214

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Glimmer or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper