Model comparison

Molmo 2 8b vs Qwen2.5-Max

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 55.4 to 49.4.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Molmo 2 8b and Qwen2.5-Max specifications
Molmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.140.7
Released—2025-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked527

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
LiveBench Coding—64.4%
LMArena Coding—1359

Reasoning Too close to call

Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12871360
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—132.53
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
LiveBench Math—58.4%
LMArena Math—1369

Knowledge Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
Confabulations—21.8%
LMArena Expert—1337

Multimodal Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Qwen2.5-Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Vision1081—

Multilingual Qwen2.5-Max leads

Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English12761352
LMArena Chinese—1382
LMArena French—1396
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1300
LMArena Korean—1304
LMArena Russian—1353
LMArena Spanish—1377

Instruction Following Qwen2.5-Max leads

Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following12701335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%

Long Context Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query—1358

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5-Max leads

Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text12881367
LMArena Creative Writing—1339
Short-Story Creative Writing—72.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1364
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Molmo 2 8b better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Qwen2.5-Max share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper