Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Molmo 2 8b

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 49.4.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Molmo 2 8b specifications
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index40.839.1
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked385

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
LMArena Coding1400—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Molmo 2 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts14071287
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Molmo 2 8b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
LMArena Math1428—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
LMArena Expert1398—

Multimodal Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision12401081

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English14111276
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1424—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1413—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1420—
LMArena Spanish1421—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following13771270

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Longer Query1394—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Text14161288
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
LMArena Multi-Turn1417—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Molmo 2 8b?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Molmo 2 8b share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper